Knights of the Lunch Table Forums

Video Games => Console Games => Topic started by: Level_9_Chao on July 09, 2007, 07:33:21 pm



Title: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Level_9_Chao on July 09, 2007, 07:33:21 pm
Prove me wrong.

That's right. You can't. Because it is made of overrated and crap.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Zro on July 09, 2007, 09:57:00 pm
(http://www.seashepherd.org/seals/images/seal_of_approval_180.gif)


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on July 10, 2007, 01:23:53 pm
it is made of overrated
???
Saying that it is overrated and crap doesn't really say why you think it sucks. People like it because of it's playability and storyline. As well as easter eggs and glitches. (Plus the Master Chief just owns)
I can't argue with you if I don't know why you hate it.

Especially if Zro doesn't even say anything.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Zro on July 10, 2007, 02:10:35 pm
Lol my picture got deleted. =(
It was a seal of approval, haha.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Level_9_Chao on July 10, 2007, 08:58:13 pm
???
Saying that it is overrated and crap doesn't really say why you think it sucks. People like it because of it's playability and storyline. As well as easter eggs and glitches. (Plus the Master Chief just owns)
I can't argue with you if I don't know why you hate it.

Especially if Zro doesn't even say anything.

Playability: another generic shooter offering nothing really different and having the same control as like every other shooter ever.
Storyline: OH **** ALIENS
Easter eggs: A gun everybody knows about and a soccer ball.
Glitches: will never kick as much BUM-BUM as the black hole. Not even the flying tank.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on July 11, 2007, 07:52:34 am
Halo is a shooter that it is very easy to get a handle on, and the menus are set up well enough that you can play a substantial game in like 10 minutes. That's why it's fun.

Also, the weapons are simple yet personalized to the game, so you have stuff to learn when you first start, but you already have a pretty good grasp on the situation.

As for graphics, they are very well done with low-poly models, allowing them to put ungodly amounts of high-def textures in. Very pretty, very easy to run. Har-tok.

And I see no reason that this shouldn't be in video games, so that's where it's going.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on July 11, 2007, 04:16:51 pm

Playability: another generic shooter offering nothing really different and having the same control as like every other shooter ever.
Storyline: OH **** ALIENS
Easter eggs: A gun everybody knows about and a soccer ball.
Glitches: will never kick as much BUM-BUM as the black hole. Not even the flying tank.
Storyline is more of: Okay, we just got back from hopefully defeating the Covenant. Woah, they're attacking them, we should follow them and defend Earth. Covenant Side: Okay, you need to go stop a heretic leader, but get caught up in a plot to take over the covenant from the inside.

Easter Eggs: The Skulls. Back-Levels. Scarab Gun. Soccer Ball. Dancing Grunties.

Glitches: Blackhole is better, but the glitches are more numerous and outweigh Smash's glitches.

What else?


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Level_9_Chao on July 11, 2007, 07:14:42 pm
Storyline is more of: Okay, we just got back from hopefully defeating the Covenant. Woah, they're attacking them, we should follow them and defend Earth. Covenant Side: Okay, you need to go stop a heretic leader, but get caught up in a plot to take over the covenant from the inside.

a.k.a. OH **** ALIENS

Easter Eggs: The Skulls. Back-Levels. Scarab Gun. Soccer Ball. Dancing Grunties.

Everything has back levels. Scarab gun is useless in modern society. Soccer ball does nothing. I forgot what the skulls did, but it was pointless, I believe. Dancing Grunties are less funny than Roy sucking Fox.

Glitches: Blackhole is better, but the glitches are more numerous and outweigh Smash's glitches.

Games shouldn't have glitches anyway, especially since Halo 2 is just Halo 1 with crap added on whereas Smash Melee is a total rewrite of N64.

What else?

I am a giant **** by trying to compare an FPS to a fighting game.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on July 12, 2007, 02:25:01 pm
All the things you've said so far are completely bias. The storyline lets you play as the covenant, so your opinion of the overview is extremely wrong. Fact beats opinion.

Super Smash has back levels? Wow, really? Can you actually go into the background and move around in 3-Dimensions?

The scarab gun being useless in modern society was a pointless statement; Metal Boxes would be equally pointless if not greater.

The soccer ball is just an easter egg that you can play with if you're playing co-op with a friend. Roy owns.

Smash Melee is not a "total rewrite" as you said. Otherwise the controls would be different. Tell me how Smash is a total rewrite and I'll let you know why you're wrong. And Halo 2 technically is Halo 1 with better things added on such as new storyline, more weapons, enhanced graphics, new multiplayer maps, more customization, and better online play(the list goes on). Super smash is technically the same, just not as many upgrades.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Level_9_Chao on July 12, 2007, 07:29:52 pm
All the things you've said so far are completely bias. The storyline lets you play as the covenant, so your opinion of the overview is extremely wrong. Fact beats opinion.

Fact: OH **** ALIENS vs. OH **** HUMANS
Opinion: It's just like any other humans vs. aliens intergalactic space battle with guns.

Quote
Super Smash has back levels? Wow, really? Can you actually go into the background and move around in 3-Dimensions?
I don't even know what a back level is, and if Halo can't give me some 2D action or basically innovate in any way, shut it.

Quote
The scarab gun being useless in modern society was a pointless statement; Metal Boxes would be equally pointless if not greater.
Too bad Smash is a fantasy involving imagination therefore not needing a point. Halo's makes no sense. Why the hell would a gun just be up there? Halo is supposed to take place in "real life," Smash does not.

Quote
The soccer ball is just an easter egg that you can play with if you're playing co-op with a friend. Roy owns.
a.k.a does nothing of value. Falco is better.

Quote
Smash Melee is not a "total rewrite" as you said. Otherwise the controls would be different. Tell me how Smash is a total rewrite and I'll let you know why you're wrong. And Halo 2 technically is Halo 1 with better things added on such as new storyline, more weapons, enhanced graphics, new multiplayer maps, more customization, and better online play(the list goes on). Super smash is technically the same, just not as many upgrades.

Melee is a total rewrite because the graphics were enhanced ENORMOUSLY. Extra moves were added. Way, way more strategy and physics defying (wavedash, ledge hogging, etc.). Tournament mode, trophies, snapshots, data on everything ever. Two more single player modes in addition to 4 stadiums and the many missions, a crapload of new characters, every character having new moves (and the old moves were changed in their strength and movement petterns), more depth like crazy hand, and only 3 stages in the game that were actually from the N64 version. 26 original new stages, not to mention the extra stages like target test and home runs. Tons of new items. Controls are totally different because the controller is different. Not to mention it was written for an entirely new console, not just ported over and tweaked. So I guess that doesn't make it a total rewrite. Huh. I thought it did.

Halo's storyline is a trilogy, I believe. So no, it isn't new. Also who cares, all you do is shoot things. I could be illiterate and deaf and have just as much fun if not more. New weapons are definitely there but fail to innovate. Enhanced graphics? No, it's the same darn game, except when you look at Master Chief's armor, you can see shininess or something pointless like that. Customization? Examples plox. Online play? 10 YEAR OLDS. So, yes, they took the same exact game, gave you some new levels, guns, and like 4 vehicles, but that's it. It's Halo 1 with some more guns and stages. The code and engine remain virtually unchanged.


However, Brawl is definitely borrowing from Melee's engine. But will still be better than Halo 3. December 3rd. BE THERE OR BE TRIANGULAR.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on July 13, 2007, 08:41:04 am
READ THIS 'CAUSE THIS POST WILL RUIN ALL OF CHAO'S

Rewriting:

Codec from N64- Gamecube = Complete revision.

Codec from GC to Wii = Not a complete revision, but a bit of one

Codec from Xbox to Xbox = OSHI~

That's why Halo 1 and Halo 2 are really closely similar. They have the same engine. New things like guns, better ragdoll, better obphys, and better texturing were added. Also note that running Halo 1 and Halo 2 is indefinitely easy because of the amazingly lowpoly models and textures.

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not all for Halo. I just don't think it's the wash-up game that you claim it to be. Whenever I here people call themselves 'gamers' because they are 'ownage' at Halo or Gears on XBL, I wanna grab them, shake them, and jam some Zelda and a GameBoy down their sheltered mouths. I DEFINITELY say it's overrated, and I agree that it's not as well made of a game as Smash.

However, since the playstyle is so fast and smooth, and the surprisingly loose physics systems allows for games to always be fun, especially with friends. This isn't a game that I would pay for to play online, but it is a game that I enjoy playing with you guys at sleepovers or such like.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Zro on July 13, 2007, 03:14:37 pm
Quote
Whenever I here people call themselves 'gamers' because they are 'ownage' at Halo or Gears on XBL
Oh ho, don't get me started on those people. In my multimedia class there was this amazingly annoying little medget kid that sat in my row, and one day when I wore my "die, n00b." shirt... he walked up to me and started babbaling about, "What!, You calling me a n00b, i will pwn you in Halo ****, yea. Thats right. I'll frag you so hard. Your the n00b!" Yea, take note that this was like during class and he has quite a loud high pitched voice. It was funny and sad at the same time.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on July 13, 2007, 05:04:10 pm
Halo is a tad overrated but it's just one of the most identifiable shooter games out at the moment.

But let me just act like you are, but towards Smash.

Playability: Side-scrolling fighting game where you got launched off the edge of a cliff

Story: BEAT PEOPLE SENSELESSLY!

Easter eggs: GAME CHARACTERS NO ONE CARES ABOUT AS TROPHIES!

Glitches: One massively overrated glitch.

(I don't feel that way about the game, but that's EXACTLY what you're doing)


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on July 13, 2007, 09:09:05 pm
HAY CHAO

I KNOW MORE ABOUT 3D GRAPHICS, ART, AND RENDERING THAN YOU DO

SO TO ATTACK YOUR POST ABOUT 'ADDED SHININESS'

Halo 1: Very, VERY well made low poly-models that were disguised unbelievably well with above average textures, making for a game requiring low memory and low processing power. That was AMAZING when it came out. Before Halo, everyone thought that making better graphics would forever and always require some heavy duty equipment. People still think that, but now you see games like BF2142 and your precious Super Smash Bros: Brawl, that have found that you can make amazing graphics with low memory models. Before Halo, you got high-power games, an example being the Morrowind series. So, completely revolutionary. Game play was great because it was quick, but the main breaker was its revolutionary graphics. Game = Overrated, Turning point in the gaming market = Not.

Halo 2: An extension on what was already awesome. They managed to once again point out that you can make games amazing, and still play them on systems that most people think can't handle. Microsoft made an amazing amount of money, and also proved that skilled artists were more important than powerful machines. Don't bash Halo: It made gaming what it is today.

:D

EDIT: However, the gameplay overall, taking content, creativity, and innovation into consideration, is WAY overrated. Smash is better by far, because it proved that gameplay is more important than fancy graphics. The PS3 currently tries to prove that wrong. WHOOPS


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on July 20, 2007, 05:22:04 pm
ok. wtf is up with you people in glitches and easter eggs?
do you buy a game for its glitches and easter eggs?? when you sit down to play a game do you decide which based on glitches and easter eggs?

as for a storyline- smash bros has absolutely no storyline. its still a good game. a great game. but no story line. however crappy you think the halo storyline is, it cant be any worse than NO storyline.

as for graphics- smash bros is inferior, but I dont care. as long as it looks decent and the effects dont distract from gameplay, it doesnt matter that much to me. although I do sort of start drooling when I see really nice looking games.

as for gameplay- gameplay is what does it for me. the gameplay in both SSBM and in Halo 2 are phenomenal. The best of the best. one is an arcade style fighter, the other is a FPS. 2 very different genres.

there. I proved using logic that halo is just as good as smash bros if not better.



Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Level_9_Chao on July 22, 2007, 05:20:20 pm
as for a storyline- smash bros has absolutely no storyline. its still a good game. a great game. but no story line. however crappy you think the halo storyline is, it cant be any worse than NO storyline.

Smash is about a child who creates imaginary battles with Nintendo figurines. You just have to actually think to realize it.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on July 26, 2007, 12:26:05 pm
that isnt a storyline. a storyline must have a begining, middle, and end to be a storyline. that is just one specific scene or event. you may also notice that there is no end to smash bros as the game is centered on beating your high score, beating it on the next didfficulty and beating your friends.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on July 26, 2007, 01:09:15 pm
Emphasis on beating your friends.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Level_9_Chao on July 27, 2007, 10:14:33 pm
Emphasis on beating your friends.

BEATING BEATING REVOLUTION


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Petroid on July 30, 2007, 09:10:16 pm
I like Halo for only one reason. U CAN KILL THE SHIZNIT(i say this b/c i can't say ****) OUT OF PEOPLE!!!?!?!?!


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on August 01, 2007, 04:39:14 pm
ok. wtf is up with you people in glitches and easter eggs?
do you buy a game for its glitches and easter eggs?? when you sit down to play a game do you decide which based on glitches and easter eggs?

as for a storyline- smash bros has absolutely no storyline. its still a good game. a great game. but no story line. however crappy you think the halo storyline is, it cant be any worse than NO storyline.

as for graphics- smash bros is inferior, but I dont care. as long as it looks decent and the effects dont distract from gameplay, it doesnt matter that much to me. although I do sort of start drooling when I see really nice looking games.

as for gameplay- gameplay is what does it for me. the gameplay in both SSBM and in Halo 2 are phenomenal. The best of the best. one is an arcade style fighter, the other is a FPS. 2 very different genres.

there. I proved using logic that halo is just as good as smash bros if not better.


No you didn't, you just said good things about both. You made no point in either direction.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on August 09, 2007, 01:27:26 pm
no. look at each category.

story:
halo > smash

graphics:
halo > smash

gameplay:
halo = smash

therefore:
halo > smash


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Zro on August 09, 2007, 03:43:57 pm
Quote
smash bros is inferior, but I dont care

Caring is all that matters during evaluations.

Thus:
Halo > Smash
Halo < Smash
Halo = Smash
proving that
Smash > Halo.

(see, fuzzy math is fun)


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on August 09, 2007, 08:56:55 pm
just because I dont care if Halo has better graphics doesnt mean SMASH is better. at the most it means they are equal. I dont even have to argue whether caring matters.

therefore (by you logic):

story:
halo > smash

graphics:
halo = smash

gameplay:
halo = smash

OVERALL:
halo > smash

(also for the record, just because you dont care about a particular aspect of game critique doesnt mean that you dont have to consider it for the overall picture. if I were critique-ing a game and I didnt have a single internet connection in my house, I would still have to give credit to a game with online multiplayer, even though I would never use it, because OTHER people might use it.)


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on August 09, 2007, 09:27:55 pm
just because I dont care if Halo has better graphics doesnt mean SMASH is better. at the most it means they are equal. I dont even have to argue whether caring matters.

therefore (by you logic):

story:
halo > smash

graphics:
halo = smash

gameplay:
halo = smash

OVERALL:
halo > smash

What the?

For one, this isn't a thread about Halo/Smash comparison. Also, Halo's graphics kick Smash squarely in the face. The thing that keeps Melee fast and fluid is the low-poly characters and one-faces. Also, the story for Smash is a lot deeper than the classic 'aliens attack'. At least in my opinion. I don't even feel that these games should be compared, they are much to different.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on August 10, 2007, 10:12:39 am
I agree. how did we get to this point anyway?

maybe we should move this to the debate section and call it "halo vs smash" lol


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on August 13, 2007, 12:05:53 pm
Returning to Smash's storyline, if it is a child's imagination, do they hate themselves? Seeing as the "Trophies" end up killing the child's exploding, laser-shooting, missile-launching hand.
I'd say the story takes place in an insane asylum.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on August 25, 2007, 08:21:46 am
Returning to Smash's storyline, if it is a child's imagination, do they hate themselves? Seeing as the "Trophies" end up killing the child's exploding, laser-shooting, missile-launching hand.
I'd say the story takes place in an insane asylum.
It's not any fun when the toys always win.

That's why he has lasers.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on August 26, 2007, 04:48:33 pm
Returning to Smash's storyline, if it is a child's imagination, do they hate themselves? Seeing as the "Trophies" end up killing the child's exploding, laser-shooting, missile-launching hand.
I'd say the story takes place in an insane asylum.
It's not any fun when the toys always win.

That's why he has lasers.
If it were to be said that the toys were possessed by evil/good/noobish spirits and the world was inhabited by white-glove-wearing hands, then that would make complete sense. Otherwise, why would a kid let the toys win in the first place? Little kids don't like losing.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on August 28, 2007, 05:18:37 pm
If it were to be said that the toys were possessed by evil/good/noobish spirits and the world was inhabited by white-glove-wearing hands, then that would make complete sense. Otherwise, why would a kid let the toys win in the first place? Little kids don't like losing.

THATS WHY HE BROUGHT ROCKETS AND LASERS, STUPID

THEY MAKE HIM NOT LOSE


Title: Smash Bros Vs Halo (lol)
Post by: ArkofCovenant on August 28, 2007, 08:40:22 pm
maybe u play as the toys who are tired of being stepped on, spit on, thrown around and pooped on by the little kid (represented by his hands) so the toys stage a tournament to see who is the best fighter out of all of them and the winner faces off against the child's hands and if he wins the child wont like the toys anymore because they beat him so he would get rid of them, leaving the toys to live in peace for the remainder of their lives.

although if the kid didnt like the toys he would probably either sell them (meaning they have the same predicament again) or he would throw them away (so the toys spend the rest of their lives in a landfill)
obviously this was not well thought-out by the toys.

as to the lasers and missiles, the child's parents are weapons scientists for the military, and they leave their experiments lying around the house.

wow I just wrote the friggin story to smash bros. rofl



Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on August 29, 2007, 09:17:40 pm
I still say Halo's story beats Smash'... lol


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on August 30, 2007, 01:32:16 pm
yeah, it does. seriously. except for the story I just wrote. that one is way better than both stories combined :D


Title: Re: Smash Bros Vs Halo (lol)
Post by: Hermit Solmu on September 02, 2007, 04:49:51 pm
maybe u play as the toys who are tired of being stepped on, spit on, thrown around and pooped on by the little kid (represented by his hands) so the toys stage a tournament to see who is the best fighter out of all of them and the winner faces off against the child's hands and if he wins the child wont like the toys anymore because they beat him so he would get rid of them, leaving the toys to live in peace for the remainder of their lives.

although if the kid didnt like the toys he would probably either sell them (meaning they have the same predicament again) or he would throw them away (so the toys spend the rest of their lives in a landfill)
obviously this was not well thought-out by the toys.

as to the lasers and missiles, the child's parents are weapons scientists for the military, and they leave their experiments lying around the house.

wow I just wrote the friggin story to smash bros. rofl



Fail.

The subtlety and depth of Smash's story is a lot better than Halo's classic save-the-world run.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Petroid on September 02, 2007, 06:39:08 pm
These are two completly different games, so making it impossible to... aww **** it. SMASH OWNS **** (in multiplayer) HALO PWNS IN SINGLE/MULTIPLAYER!!


But still I vote Smash


Title: Re: Smash Bros Vs Halo (lol)
Post by: ArkofCovenant on September 03, 2007, 12:43:11 pm
Fail.

The subtlety and depth of Smash's story is a lot better than Halo's classic save-the-world run.

wtf? I though we just determined smash had no story? thats kindof the reason I just wrote one because it doesnt have one....

okay who thinks that smash has a "story" who thinks it doesnt?


Title: Re: Smash Bros Vs Halo (lol)
Post by: Hermit Solmu on September 03, 2007, 02:03:32 pm
Fail.

The subtlety and depth of Smash's story is a lot better than Halo's classic save-the-world run.

wtf? I though we just determined smash had no story? thats kindof the reason I just wrote one because it doesnt have one....

okay who thinks that smash has a "story" who thinks it doesnt?
It very obviously does.

It's just not outlined by cutscenes and voice overs. You have to actually think.

To bad you can't cleverly respond because I banned you for 3 days.


Title: Re: Smash Bros Vs Halo (lol)
Post by: BlazingWyvern on September 05, 2007, 04:13:22 pm
The subtlety and depth of Smash's story is a lot better than Halo's classic save-the-world run.
Classic save-the-world run? OMG Aliens?
Tch.

Okay, how many games about aliens involve you actually teaming up with half of the alien faction you're fighting because the other half caused a mutiny that separated the race in half? And how many include a kind of life-form trapped inside of a contraption , or in this case, "Halo", that need to feed off of living things to survive, and the only way to destroy them all is wipe out existence, thus causing them to die of starvation? Not many. In fact, none.
In a sense, it's not save-the-world, it's team up and save the universe.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Petroid on September 06, 2007, 11:56:05 am
In almost every game you have to save something(usually the world) in smash, you have save your self from whose ever attacking you and you have save yourself from the master hands. But the classic save the world is sooo over used.


Title: Re: Smash Bros Vs Halo (lol)
Post by: Hermit Solmu on September 06, 2007, 08:16:03 pm
The subtlety and depth of Smash's story is a lot better than Halo's classic save-the-world run.
Classic save-the-world run? OMG Aliens?
Tch.

Okay, how many games about aliens involve you actually teaming up with half of the alien faction you're fighting because the other half caused a mutiny that separated the race in half? And how many include a kind of life-form trapped inside of a contraption , or in this case, "Halo", that need to feed off of living things to survive, and the only way to destroy them all is wipe out existence, thus causing them to die of starvation? Not many. In fact, none.
In a sense, it's not save-the-world, it's team up and save the universe.
In a sense, it's save the world, plus details.

Seriously, it's an over-used plotline. Not that that is bad, oh no. I've seen classic plots used greatly; Halo is one example. Resident Evil 4 is another one: SAVE THE PRESIDENTS DAUGHTER LOL. Still, both great games.

Smash takes the story in a whole new direction. It's not an overused plotline, because it's completely new.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on September 08, 2007, 07:14:16 pm
Yeah. I do like the fact that Brawl will actually incorporate a storyline that isn't really "Open Ended".


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: okdud12 on September 11, 2007, 10:21:59 pm
halo doesn't suck!

and halo 3 soon!


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on September 13, 2007, 07:41:23 pm
dude seriously, try to make yur posts relevant to the thread not just the title.
I bet u didnt even read the thread. or even more than 2 of the posts.
anyway I hope the "story" in brawl will be good or else I will be angry cuz they should have just taken mine and but it in there instead if they are just gonna throw togather some crap


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on September 14, 2007, 07:02:22 am
dude seriously, try to make yur posts relevant to the thread not just the title.
I bet u didnt even read the thread. or even more than 2 of the posts.
anyway I hope the "story" in brawl will be good or else I will be angry cuz they should have just taken mine and but it in there instead if they are just gonna throw togather some crap
Lol @ you throwing together some crap.

Also, the Melee story is gonna be better than the Brawl one. Phiscological questioning on life by means of toys > The Subspace Emissary.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on September 15, 2007, 08:03:28 pm
for those of us who are too lazy, what is this "subspace emmisary" thing?


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: BlazingWyvern on September 16, 2007, 01:10:58 pm
for those of us who are too lazy, what is this "subspace emmisary" thing?
Meaning you? In general, it's the storyline that is different depending on which Character you use.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on September 16, 2007, 06:02:13 pm
for those of us who are too lazy, what is this "subspace emmisary" thing?
Meaning you? In general, it's the storyline that is different depending on which Character you use.
I'm hoping that it'll be made so you can only see the whole story if you beat it with every character.


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: ArkofCovenant on September 16, 2007, 07:44:41 pm
so what kind of "emissary" are u, and where are u going?


Title: Re: Halo Sucks.
Post by: Hermit Solmu on October 02, 2007, 04:04:51 pm
so what kind of "emissary" are u, and where are u going?
www.smashbros.com

Click the old updates, and just keep looking back. You'll find all the info we know.